×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Downtown Oakland Specific Plan Zoning Amendments

Review and comment directly on the draft text amendments and maps

The following Draft Planning Code Amendments and Draft Zoning Map and associated maps are designed to implement the goals of the Downtown Oakland Specific Plan, and have been published for public review. This Konveio application allows community members to collaboratively comment directly the proposed changes, both the text and the maps. If you have any questions about how to use this interactive version of the Draft Zoning Amendments, please send an email to plandowntownoakland@oaklandca.gov.

Please visit the DOSP Draft Zoning Amendments page for summary materials, informational videos, document downloads, details about upcoming public meetings and contact information to provide feedback on these proposals in other ways.

To learn more about what the DOSP does and why it matters, watch this video or visit the main DOSP website (bit.ly/OakDOSP). You can sign up to receive the zoning amendments when they are released and receive updates, reminders and information about how to review, comment and participate in community discussions about the amendments.

How it works

Table of Contents: This draft policy has an interactive table of contents that will allow you to jump to a specific section of the document. Click on the table of contents button to reveal it and then click on any section to jump directly there. 

Adding a Comment: Once you have reviewed the document, feel free to add your comment(s) to the spot in the draft policy that it pertains to by clicking next to it.  In that window,  provide your name, email address and your commentary.  Select the comment type and then click on "add comment".

View all comments: Simply click on the bubbles to view all comments made in the draft policy. Keep in mind all comments can be up- and down-voted by other users, making it easier to avoid duplication and helping us prioritize ideas and suggestions. 

What happens next: Planning staff will review public comments from this interactive version as well as feedback from meetings, emails and surveys, and use that input to revise the amendments for presentation to the Planning Commission.

Terms & Conditions: Please see the Terms & Conditions for details on community guidelines and acceptable uses of this platform. These terms apply to all visitors, users and others who wish to access or comment on this draft policy.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Suggestion
I agree with Dan's comment- allowing residential use would make this area more vibrant. Being too restrictive on permitted uses might be counterproductive. There is already a lot of underutilized dining and retail space along the waterfront, which may be a result of overly restrictive development. Restricting this entire area to just retail, dining and entertainment seems overly prescriptive.
0 replies
Suggestion
This area should also encourage residential uses. More residents would increase foot traffic, enhance vibrancy and support the retail/dining/entertainment uses.
0 replies
Suggestion
What does this actually mean? This language is too vague and could be interpreted in many different ways. I don't believe new buildings should be limited to the height and scale of older buildings. Large and small buildings coexist in successful neighborhoods all over the world. Existing building sizes should not limit the scale of new development. Downtown Oakland should become denser, and that means that new buildings should be larger than existing buildings. This language could be used to say that new buildings should not be any larger than existing buildings. Please revise text.
0 replies
Suggestion
The mixed-use district described in this sentence would require dense new developments that will change the character of the neighborhood. I would focus on bringing in new development with places for people to live over preserving the past and condo values to existing owners.
0 replies
Suggestion
Best way to encourage mixed-use residential development would be to allow dense high-rise (150'+)housing developments with ground floor retail in these areas.
0 replies
Suggestion
CBD should allow the market to decide on du/ac and FAR. Should be unlimited.
0 replies
Suggestion
I use to live in this area. Would be much more lively and safe with more people. Please allow much greater density, heights of at least 150 feet, and commercial ground floor. 250 du/ac at least.
0 replies
Suggestion
Too few units per acre. 250 du/ac should be the base for this area.
0 replies
Suggestion
125 units per acre is too low for anywhere near downtown. We are in a housing crisis and need to make sure high-density development can be built in all areas around downtown. While I don't believe dwelling units per acre should be regulated, in this area they should be at least 250 du/ac.
0 replies